July 23, 2025 by Sarika Kumari
A Patent Show Cause Hearing is an official opportunity for the patent applicant to defend their invention before the Controller of Patents, especially when the First Examination Report (FER) objections remain unresolved after the reply.
It’s essentially a final oral argument to clarify, explain, and "show cause" why your application should not be refused.
It is the last opportunity to persuade the Controller before a patent is either granted or rejected.
|
Provision |
Description |
|
Section 14 & 15, Patents Act, 1970 |
Patent examination & hearing provision |
|
Timeline |
Hearing is usually scheduled after the FER reply, when objections persist |
|
Outcome |
Either the patent is granted, refused, or further amendments are requested |
A hearing notice is sent when:
The FER reply fails to resolve all objections, especially substantive ones like novelty, inventive step, or Section 3 issues
There’s a disagreement on claim amendments
The Controller believes the invention is not patentable under law
A hearing notice typically provides a date and time for the oral hearing and may request additional written submissions beforehand.
Date and venue (in-person or virtual)
Summary of pending objections
Deadline for filing written submissions (usually 2–7 days before the hearing)
Link (for virtual hearings) via Webex/MS Teams, etc.
Name of the Patent Controller assigned
Application number & hearing date
Name of the Patent Controller assigned
Objections still unresolved (typically mentioned in the notice)
Mode of hearing (in-person or virtual – usually via Webex/MS Teams)
Deadline for pre-hearing submissions (usually 2–7 days before hearing)
Tips: Note down all key dates, and immediately begin preparations—delayed responses or absence may lead to rejection.
Revisit:
The original First Examination Report (FER)
Your previously filed FER reply
Any amendments or documents submitted after that
Objective:
Determine:
Which objections have already been resolved
Which ones are still active or critical
Whether Section 3, novelty, or inventive step are the main issues
Example:
If the Controller has raised objections under Section 3(d), your focus should be on proving enhanced efficacy or technical advancement over known substances.
For each pending objection, prepare:
Point-wise technical justification
Experimental data, if applicable
Distinction from cited prior art
Legal arguments, if objected under Section 3, 59, etc.
|
Objection |
How to Respond |
|
Novelty |
Show clear feature not disclosed in prior art |
|
Inventive Step |
Highlight unexpected technical effect or complexity |
|
Section 3(k)/3(d) |
Provide working data or claim construction differences |
|
Formal Defect |
File missing document or clarification |
Although not mandatory, it is strategically essential to submit a written hearing brief before the actual hearing.
Brief intro of the invention
Table listing each objection with your rebuttal
References to claim numbers and paragraph numbers
Attachments (amended claims, technical documents)
Statement requesting grant of patent
During the hearing, you will have around 15–30 minutes to defend your application.
How to Present:
Start with a summary of your invention and its key features
Address each objection clearly, referencing claim numbers and prior art
Use technical drawings or diagrams to simplify explanations
If questioned, answer precisely — do not argue emotionally or aggressively
Tips:
Keep a hearing brief or slide deck ready
Use keywords and legal terms from the Patents Act
Practice explaining your invention in non-jargon, clear language
If, during the hearing, the Controller suggests claim amendments:
Submit Form 13 with revised claims
Ensure no new subject matter is introduced
The amendments must stay within the original disclosure
Usually, you’ll be given 15–30 days post-hearing to file amended claims or documents.
Prepare thoroughly with claim-prior art comparison
Submit written submissions before the hearing
Keep the conversation technical and precise
Respect time and professional tone
File Form 13 on time if claims are amended
Don’t repeat prior FER responses word-forrword
Don’t argue emotionally
Don’t introduce new subject matter
Don’t ignore or delay attending the hearing
|
Outcome |
What It Means |
|
Patent Accepted |
You’ll receive the grant certificate shortly |
|
Further Clarifications Needed |
You may be asked to file revised claims or data |
|
Patent Refused |
A reasoned order is issued, which can be appealed at IPAB or High Court |
|
Tip |
Why It Helps |
|
Be Specific |
Vague responses may lead to refusal |
|
Support with Evidence |
Use technical diagrams, publications, test results |
|
Anticipate Questions |
Prepare for likely queries from the Controller |
|
Respect Deadlines |
Submit any documents on time |
|
Hire a Patent Professional |
Agents/attorneys handle FER and hearings effectively |
Patent Hearings Are Your Last Line of Defense.
Patent show cause hearings can feel intimidating, but they are valuable opportunities to defend your invention.
A clear, well-supported hearing strategy often turns a near-rejection into a grant.
Don't ignore or delay response to a hearing notice. Use it as your final chance to convince the Controller of your invention’s novelty, inventive step, and patentability.
Q1. Is a hearing mandatory?
๐ No, but if you don’t attend or submit written arguments, the application may be rejected ex parte.
Q2. Can I request a rescheduling of the hearing?
๐ Yes, by writing to the Controller at least 2–3 days in advance with valid reasons.
Q3. Do I need a patent attorney to attend the hearing?
๐ It’s not mandatory, but highly recommended, especially for complex inventions.
Q4. What happens if the Controller rejects my arguments?
๐ You’ll receive a reasoned refusal, which can be appealed to the IPD (High Court) or IPAB.
Q5. Can I file further amendments post-hearing?
๐ Yes, if allowed by the Controller, usually within a specified time window.